To Belt or Not To Belt?
September 2nd, 2009One of the more interesting debates among devotees of the fine art of orgasm denial is around the use of chastity devices. With apologies to William Shakespeare, To belt, or not to belt: that is the question.
There are many dominants who feel that a chastity belt is absolutely essential for putting their submissives into the proper mental state. When a submissive is locked in a device such as the Chrome Cock Cage, his inability to touch his own penis or masturbate to orgasm is a powerful reminder that his sexual activities are being controlled by someone else. The physical sensation of being locked inside the chastity belt and the discomfort experienced when trying to get erect have powerful mental effects that are tremendously effective at maintaining a strong desire to serve.
Some dominants also feel that men are incapable of “keeping their hands out of the cookie jar”, particularly when the submissive has been denied sexual release for a long period of time. Since the submissive can’t be trusted to keep from masturbating, the argument goes, some mechanical assistance is needed to prevent “accidents” from occurring. There are also those who prefer to use chastity devices because they love the sight of a man’s cock and balls locked in a cage. The Houdini chastity device, which presents a visual contrast between the head of the caged penis surrounded by cold, unyielding steel, is one of the most visually attractive chastity belts available.
On the other side of the debate are those who prefer not to use chastity belts at all. The first dominant I ever knew felt that using a chastity cage made life too easy for the submissive. Her belief was that when denied orgasm for an extended period of time and desperate to cum, it is far harder for the submissive to know that he could cum if he wanted to, but to choose not to. She loved the idea that despite suffering intense sexual frustration and having the ability to relieve that frustration by masturbating, her submissive would still choose to remain chaste because that was her wish. Knowing that her submissive was the one making the decision to prolong his own suffering was a big part of why she enjoyed chastity play.
So, to belt or not to belt? As with many forms of BDSM play, there is no right or wrong answer. Whether you prefer that the submissive stays chaste by his own free will, or you want to hear the undeniably sexy sound of a lock clicking shut, the knowledge that the submissive’s next orgasm won’t come until the dominant gives permission can be a tremendous turn-on for all.
When Indy isn’t busy running OrgasmDenial.com, a social networking site for chastity enthusiasts, he produces original tease & denial videos for Teasing-Video.com. Indy is a lifestyle switch who splits his time between Vancouver, BC and Las Vegas, NV.


September 23rd, 2009 at 4:16 pm
I have an issue with this entire argument. I see it on various web boards, and IMO, it’s simply an excuse for one group of people to proclaim their righteousness by co-opting The One True Way®.
As somebody who wears a device most of the time, I can tell you that it has nothing to do with self-control. Rather, the hotness factor has to do with the idea of control. My wife, the venerable Mrs. Edge, wants me to wear a device (generally my modified CB3000*) because she, herself, kinks on having her own control that has nothing to do with my will power. In other words, while some Doms crow about how well their sub has been trained, my wife prefers to know for a fact that she has the control.
In other words, it’s not a matter of simply using the device because I’m not “subby enough” (whatever the hell that means); it’s a matter of what the both of us find to be arousing.
*And don’t get me started on the ridiculous argument that only the full metal belts are “real” chastity devices. Sheesh…